AF Form 1667: Supply Difficulty Report Guide & Download

AF Form 1667: Supply Difficulty Report Guide & DownloadThe AF Form 1667, officially titled Supply Difficulty Report, is a key U.S. Air Force form used to document and escalate supply-related challenges that affect mission readiness. Logistics and supply professionals across Active Duty, Air Force Reserve, and Air National Guard units rely on it to report issues with Air Force-managed items when standard supply processes fall short.

This article explains the form’s purpose, when to use it, how to complete it, and where to download the latest version. It serves as a practical resource for base supply personnel, maintenance technicians, and commanders dealing with stock shortages, backorders, or other materiel management problems.

What Is AF Form 1667?

AF Form 1667 (also known as AF IMT 1667, dated March 1984) is the official Supply Difficulty Report. It allows units to formally notify higher-level supply authorities about difficulties obtaining parts, equipment, or consumables that impact operations.

The form captures critical details such as:

  • The affected item (by NSN, nomenclature, part number)
  • The specific problem
  • Mission impact
  • Local resolution attempts
  • Supporting data on stock levels, demands, due-outs, and weapon system effects (e.g., NMCS/PMCS hours)

It features a front side for core problem description and a reverse side for additional requisition, quantity, priority, and status data. The form is prescribed under Air Force materiel management guidance and remains available for use where applicable.

Note: While many Air Force processes have moved to digital systems (e.g., through DAFI 23-101 / DAFMAN 23-300 for materiel management), the AF Form 1667 provides a standardized paper or printable method for documenting persistent supply difficulties, especially for items managed centrally by the Air Force.

Purpose of the Supply Difficulty Report

The primary goal of AF Form 1667 is to highlight supply chain issues that local base supply cannot resolve quickly. It helps escalate problems so that inventory managers, item managers, or higher headquarters can take corrective action—such as adjusting stock levels, expediting requisitions, or investigating systemic problems.

Key benefits include:

  • Documenting mission degradation risks (e.g., increased Not Mission Capable Supply or NMCS hours)
  • Supporting requests for special levels, local purchase, or local manufacture
  • Providing data for trend analysis in the Air Force supply system
  • Ensuring accountability in the materiel management process

Supply difficulty reports for Air Force-managed items are typically processed within a set number of calendar days (often referenced in training materials as requiring prompt handling to minimize operational impact).

This form complements broader policies in DAFI 23-101 (Materiel Management) and DAFMAN 23-300, which govern supply chain procedures, allowance standards, due-outs, and deficiency reporting across the Department of the Air Force.

When Should You Use AF Form 1667?

Use the form when you encounter persistent or significant supply difficulties, such as:

  • Chronic backorders or zero stock on critical items
  • Parts shortages causing mission delays or increased cannibalization
  • Items where local actions (e.g., cannibalization, local purchase, or repair) have been exhausted
  • High-impact shortages affecting weapon systems, NMCS/PMCS status, or unit readiness
  • Situations requiring higher headquarters intervention for stock replenishment or policy adjustments

It is not for routine supply discrepancy reports (SDRs) or standard requisitions—those use other processes or forms. Focus on Air Force-managed items where standard channels have not resolved the issue.

Always coordinate with your base supply or Chief of Supply before submission.

How to Fill Out AF Form 1667: Step-by-Step Guidance?

Complete the form accurately and completely. Provide supporting documentation (e.g., requisition numbers, stock status screenshots) whenever possible.

Front Side Key Blocks:

  1. Organization and Location — Enter your unit designation and base/location.
  2. Subject (NSN, Nomenclature and Control Number) — List the National Stock Number (NSN), item name, and any control numbers.
  3. Problem — Clearly describe the supply difficulty (e.g., “Item on continuous backorder for 120+ days with no projected receipt date”).
  4. Effect of Shortage on Unit Mission — Explain operational impact (e.g., “Prevents scheduled maintenance on F-16 aircraft, adding 45 NMCS hours monthly”).
  5. Local Actions to Resolve Problem — Detail steps already taken (e.g., cannibalization checks, local purchase consideration, expedited requisitions). 6–7. Estimated Impact and Quantity Required — Provide data on continuing effects and 90-day needs. 8–14. Additional fields for ERRC, cost, part number, manufacturing data, etc. 15–20. Stock and demand history (past 90 days demands, due-outs/ins, serviceable/unserviceable balances, weapon system NMCS/PMCS hours, etc.). 21–23. Chief of Supply name/grade, signature, and date.

Reverse Side expands on requisitions, priorities, due-ins/outs (WRM, FSS, other), and related metrics.

Check applicable boxes for local manufacture or purchase reviews. For equipment vs. consumable items, include authorized vs. on-hand quantities where relevant.

Tips for Completion:

  • Be factual and quantifiable — use demand data, NMCS hours, and mission effects.
  • Use clear, concise language.
  • Ensure the Chief of Supply or designated approver reviews and signs.
  • Retain copies for unit records per AF records management policies.

For the most accurate completion, refer directly to the form and your unit’s supply procedures under current DAF materiel management guidance.

Download AF Form 1667

The official fillable or printable version of AF Form 1667 is available from the Department of the Air Force e-Publishing site:

→ Download AF Form 1667 PDF herehttps://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a4/form/af1667/af1667.pdf

Always verify you are using the current version from www.e-publishing.af.mil. Previous editions are generally authorized unless otherwise specified.

AF Form 1667 operates within the broader framework of:

  • DAFI 23-101 / DAFMAN 23-300 — Core guidance for materiel management, supply chain processes, and inventory control.
  • Allowance standards, Weapon System Readiness, and due-out management.
  • Deficiency reporting and Source, Maintenance, and Recoverability (SMR) coding where applicable.

For full context, review these publications on the e-Publishing site. Units should also consult local supplements or MAJCOM guidance for submission routing.

Best Practices for Handling Supply Difficulties

  1. Exhaust local options first (repair, cannibalization, lateral support).
  2. Document everything thoroughly — this strengthens your report.
  3. Submit promptly to avoid mission degradation.
  4. Follow up through your supply chain or logistics readiness channels.
  5. Use the form as part of a larger effort to improve overall supply performance metrics.

Effective use of AF Form 1667 helps maintain Air Force readiness by surfacing and resolving systemic supply issues.

Conclusion

The AF Form 1667 Supply Difficulty Report remains an important tool for U.S. Air Force logistics personnel facing materiel challenges. By providing a structured way to report problems and their mission effects, it supports timely resolution and better supply chain outcomes.

For official use, always download the form directly from the Air Force e-Publishing website and follow current Department of the Air Force instructions on materiel management. If you need assistance with a specific supply issue, contact your unit’s Logistics Readiness Squadron or base supply section.

Keywords: AF Form 1667, Supply Difficulty Report, Air Force supply form, AF IMT 1667, DAFI 23-101, materiel management, NMCS report, Air Force logistics.

This guide is for informational purposes and is based on publicly available official sources. Always refer to the latest publications and consult your chain of command for policy compliance.